<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Media Flow &#187; Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themediaflow.com/category/blog/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themediaflow.com</link>
	<description>the media flow - a fresh-thinking online consultancy assisting you to extend your brand, grow your audience and increase online revenues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>London Affiliate Conference &#8211; Keynote: Bing, The New Search Experience</title>
		<link>http://www.themediaflow.com/2010/01/london-affiliate-conference-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themediaflow.com/2010/01/london-affiliate-conference-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nichola</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themediaflow.com/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speakers: Cedric Chambaz and Adam Goodman &#8211; Microsoft Advertising.
Confession. I bleed purple. I have an emotional as well as professional motive for attending this session. I&#8217;m also becomming a big Bing fan of late and I&#8217;m pretty excited to see what they come up with this year.
2009 – Bing has established itself as the “best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speakers: Cedric Chambaz and Adam Goodman &#8211; Microsoft Advertising.</p>
<p>Confession. I bleed purple. I have an emotional as well as professional motive for attending this session. I&#8217;m also becomming a big Bing fan of late and I&#8217;m pretty excited to see what they come up with this year.</p>
<p>2009 – Bing has established itself as the “best converting” search engine.</p>
<p>Cedric, 34MM UU in the UK across MSN Windows Live Messenger etc. IT’s not all about reach for you – it’s about performance. Today we’re looking at product capabilities focusing on Bing.</p>
<p>Launched June 2009 and is apparently the “best converting” search engine.</p>
<p>One question we always get. Why bother in search? A – because we are committed to succeed. 5 yrs ago Steve Ballmer said “we want to be number 2”, now they are so how to take it further.</p>
<p>Context – in ten years we have seen 100,000% growth in content. Everything has changed including consumer behaviour. It’s way more difficult to get around the web – hence the rise of search. More and more people are searching more and more.</p>
<p>Queries are becoming more complex in string length and composition. Many more variables to consider and consumers are voicing their frustrations with the search experience. Consumers have evolved faster than search.</p>
<p>Bing Promise: – A brand new search experience. Rich and engaging search content to help British consumers reach more content more quickly.</p>
<p>Intent – we switch on the internet because we want to switch on the internet. Just like TV. Don’t really have an objective in mind.</p>
<p>Bing – capturing  attention using the UI – the attractive imagery. Intended to be a source of information too, with some rollover features. Images are chosen locally by UK journo.</p>
<p><strong>To the search engine nitty gritty.</strong></p>
<p>Many, many queries are purely navigational – therefore why clutter the SERP with anything other than the desired object. E.g. “William Hill” , you would expect the brand result for William Hill.</p>
<p>Informational searches – delivering the answer in the SERP with the feature “instant answer”. E.g. if you type the ref for your flight &#8220;BA74&#8243; in the search box then details of the flight will appear in the SERP, giving an instant answer; such as &#8220;BA74 departed LAX at 17:45, on time and is due to land at&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<p>In the next few weeks expect to see live sports results in the SERP (done in partnership with in-market content providers). Partners include Sky Sports and Toptable.</p>
<p>UX is at the core. Understanding or catering for intent is key. Hence the left navigation. Categorised search for related query term.</p>
<p>Twitter – Bing were 1<sup>st</sup> to market with this integration.</p>
<p>Innovation is a core philosophy. Example – using visual stimulus to search, such as searching premiership players by image. Refine by rollover information on the image or refine criteria in the left-hand links. E.g. “Top Scorers” (This looks awesome).</p>
<p>He quotes John Batelle. “Search engine: the database of intent” (I’ll leave it there.)</p>
<p>Over to Adam, who manages the entertainment and gaming channel. We’re gonna get some stats (whohoo).</p>
<p>Reach – 90% of UK internet base.</p>
<p>Unique functionality and tools. MSN targeting capabilities. Adcentre platform has some sophistocated targetting – including days of the week, age and gender.</p>
<p>3<sup>rd</sup> year running NNR reports Bing as best converting search engine in the UK.</p>
<p>Bing searchers 47.4% more engaged than Google searchers.</p>
<p>The remainder is an interesting sales pitch for their various AdCenter tools, with UI screenshots. I’ll leave it there. The tool is called “Mate” and has a lot of deep-dive data, demographics, trends, KW data etc. so look it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themediaflow.com/2010/01/london-affiliate-conference-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google &#8211; Well we can&#8217;t all be perfect!</title>
		<link>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/10/google-well-we-cant-all-be-perfect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/10/google-well-we-cant-all-be-perfect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nichola</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themediaflow.com/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO is in some ways a  science and at the same time a craft. Given that the search engine algorithms are kept possibly more secret than &#8216;The Colonels Secret Recipe&#8217;, none of us know for certain the definite answer to any SEO question. Our theories of what works and what does not work, must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO is in some ways a  science and at the same time a craft. Given that the search engine algorithms are kept possibly more secret than &#8216;The Colonels Secret Recipe&#8217;, none of us know for certain the definite answer to any SEO question. Our theories of what works and what does not work, must be informed by experimenation; however working with multiple variables in an uncontrolled environment means that we can never be 100% sure that <em>our</em> <em>action</em> is the sole driver of the <em>reaction</em>.</p>
<p>If Immanuel Kant was alive today, I think he&#8217;d be an SEO on the side. I think the combination of knowledge fuelled by common results of repeated experimentation, combined with the all- too- common Cartesian doubt (did we really drop a place &#8211; or did they gain a place) would seriously appeal to him.</p>
<p>So, it is with some sense of compassion that I wanted to reference this hilarious Google result for the search term &#8220;Google Ireland&#8221;. Have a look at the top ranking results&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_618" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 587px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-618" title="Google_Ireland" src="http://www.themediaflow.com/wp-content/uploads/Google_Ireland-577x339.jpg" alt="Notes on a small Ireland" width="577" height="339" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Notes on a small Ireland</p></div>
<p>How good is that?</p>
<p>Maybe someone did a misspell in the meta keywords, cos &#8211; like New Zealand is an Ireland, right? Of course the search engines don&#8217;t use meta-keywords to inform the ranking algorithm though.</p>
<p>Regardless. My point is that SEO is an inexact science, though we can use learned inferences and experimentation to support our hypotheses, but when all is said and done &#8211; even Google can fall foul of their own algorithm.</p>
<p>Diddums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/10/google-well-we-cant-all-be-perfect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 SEO Ranking Factors Explained</title>
		<link>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/09/top-5-seo-ranking-factors-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/09/top-5-seo-ranking-factors-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nichola</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themediaflow.com/?p=589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO can be a confusing discipline for many, including those within the online industry. A lot of conflicting advice, secrecy, misdirection and outdated practise still exist. A good way to get a feel for how to cut the bullshit, (if you’re a small business or brand owner, seeking to hire an SEO) is to refer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO can be a confusing discipline for many, including those within the online industry. A lot of conflicting advice, secrecy, misdirection and outdated practise still exist. A good way to get a feel for how to cut the bullshit, (if you’re a small business or brand owner, seeking to hire an SEO) is to refer to expert blogs and independent research. A blog search engine such as <a title="Technorati Blog Search Engine" href="http://www.technorati.com" target="_blank">Technorati</a> can help you refine blogs by subject matter and will also rank blogs by authority. Additionally the consultancy SEOmoz publishes an extensive report every two years <a title="SEOmoz Search Engine Ranking Factors" href="http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors" target="_blank"><strong>Search Engine Ranking Factors</strong></a>, which uses a polling methodology which survey top SEO professionals by invitation only. Such methodology is useful as this means you get the aggregate opinion of a large number of industry leading professionals (72 respondents in 2009 edition.)</p>
<p>We can hopefully help you a little further as here we’ve taken the Top 5 Ranking Factors from the SEOmoz report, and explained what they refer to in layman terms.</p>
<p><strong>1. Keyword Focused Anchor Text from External Links</strong></p>
<p>Anchor text refers to the clickable text part of a hyperlink. Anchor text is thought to be weighted quite highly in search engine algorithms as the linked text is normally highly relevant to the landing page. Thus, the anchor text of a link is an indicator of what the linked page is about and can help search engine spiders understand the subject of the target webpage better.</p>
<p>It is best to try and use anchor text which is similar or identical to the keyword targets for your website. Whether the link is from from an internal or external source, even if you can’t use one of your keyword targets, never, ever use a generic phrase such as ‘click here’.</p>
<p><strong> 2. External Link Popularity</strong></p>
<p>External link popularity is a measure of the quality and quantity of external links that point to your website. External link popularity is an off-page factor that is supposedly impartial. The theory is that the more links that point to your website, the more popular it is therefore the more useful the pages should be. Content-rich sites should attract lots of links easily; content-poor websites should find it difficult to attract websites.</p>
<p>However it isn’t just about the quantity of links – it’s also about the quality. Not all incoming links are equal; a link from a well-repsected site from a well-respected page (such as the BBC’s homepage) will be worth far, far more than 10 links from an obscure link directory. Naturally, the more respected the website is, the harder it is to get a backlink therefore the more weight the link will carry.</p>
<p>One-way links are thought to be the best kind of link to have (where Site A =&gt; Site B only). Reciprocal linking (where Site A =&gt; Site B, and Site B =&gt; Site A) is useful, particularly if both websites are well respected, however the link is not thought to carry as much weight as a one-way link. Three way links (Site A =&gt; Site B =&gt; Site C =&gt; Site A) are at attempt by some webmasters to create more ‘natural’ looking links. Three way linking can sometimes be better than normal reciprocal links as each link looks like a one-way link.</p>
<p><strong> 3. Diversity of Link Sources</strong></p>
<p>Link diversity refers to the number of different root domains that link to your website. Although link quality and link quantity are important, the variety of links is also a critical factor in the search engine algorithms. Example www.themediaflow.com/about and www.themediaflow.com/contact<a href="../contact"></a> are two different links but are not diverse as the root domain is the same ‘themediaflow’.</p>
<p>The more domains that link to you, the more trust and authority your site is likely to have. Links from a variety of sites are also likely to create new traffic opportunities as well as giving your site exposure to a larger audience. Linking repeatedly from the same domains also looks slightly artificial – a wider sphere of influence means your site will tend to look more authentic.</p>
<p>Having a wide source of links is also a good insurance policy – if you have links from just one or two websites, what if one of the sites loses all of it’s content? You’ve suddenly lost a whole bunch of links. Or what if the search engines adjust their search engine algorithm? You could be out in the cold.</p>
<p>As a final word on link building, when you are building links for your site, don’t just look for the followed links (when links are created, you can apply an HTML attribute called ‘nofollow’ to the link which tells the search engines that the hyperlink should not influence the link target’s ranking in the SERP. Many blogs, directories and bookmarking sites have ‘nofollow’ applied as standard to any link). OK, ‘nofollow’ links won’t pass your website pages any link juice however it is slightly suspicious to only have full-fat links pointing at your website &#8211; it will probably look more natural if you have diversity in your links. Also, link building is not just about the SERP – it’s about traffic. Some of the ‘nofollow’ links may actually drive good (free) traffic at your site – and having a diverse source of traffic is great insurance against search engine algorithm changes.</p>
<p><strong>4. Keyword Use Anywhere in the Title Tag</strong></p>
<p>There are two titles that are worthy of mention: the first is within the metadata and the second is within a link.</p>
<p>Metadata title tags should appear in every page on your website and every page on your site should have unique title tags created for it. Titles should always include the keyword targets for that particular page and it is also a useful place to put in alternate spellings in the hope of ranking well (e.g. customisation vs customization). Always front-load your titles with your keywords, but don’t put too many in as this will ‘water down’ the relevance.</p>
<p>Link titles serve two purposes: to help users predict what will happen if they follow a link and to give more relevance pointers to the search engine spiders. Link titles are usually seen by the user when their mouse pointer hovers over a link. The link title should be descriptive, however they should ideally be less than 60 characters and certainly no more than 80 characters long. The link title should be used for supplementary information and to backup the anchor text of a link.</p>
<p><strong>5. Trustworthiness of the Domain Based on Link Distance from Trusted Domains</strong></p>
<p>The link distance refers to how many hops you are away from a ‘Trusted Domain’. The closer you are to a ‘Trusted Domain’ the more trust/authority you inherit from that link.</p>
<p>So what exactly is a ‘Trusted Domain’? Trusted Domains are domains which search engines believe they can trust. Unfortunately, there is no known public list of trusted domains although places such as brands are likely to be on the list. Once a site is classed as a trusted domain, it is believed that any link published within the site will get a little bit of extra link juice. Even if you can’t get a link directly from a trusted domain, by having a link from another domain which does have a link from the trusted domain, you will probably still see a little extra link juice.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say we&#8217;re pretty much in agreement with the SEOmoz Top 5 Ranking factors, though there are a number of other factors that can have both a positive and negative effect on your ranking in the SERPs that are also not to be ignored. Finally; one thing that is worth stressing time and again, is that you need to have a fair amount of good- quality, original content that grows and updates frequently. When it comes to SEO you really can not polish a turd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/09/top-5-seo-ranking-factors-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Metadata Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/08/why-metadata-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/08/why-metadata-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theMediaFlow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themediaflow.com/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’re often asked by our clients ‘What is metadata?’ and ‘Why is metadata important?’ Metadata quite literally means &#8216;data about data&#8217;. In terms of web pages, metadata allows you to describe your website, mostly for the sake of search engines but it can also benefit your users too. 
The HTML format allows for the inclusion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We’re often asked by our clients</strong> ‘What is metadata?’ and ‘Why is metadata important?’ Metadata quite literally means &#8216;data about data&#8217;. In terms of web pages, metadata allows you to describe your website, mostly for the sake of search engines but it can also benefit your users too. </p>
<p>The HTML format allows for the inclusion of a variety of types of metadata, most commonly keywords and description however it can be expanded to highly-granular information such as the Dublin Core and e-GMS standards. </p>
<p>Metadata is typically hidden from a user when they visit a webpage, however a search engine spider will be able to pick up the metadata. Metadata helps a search engine spider understand what a webpage is about, helps to categorise the webpage, and therefore helps to facilitate search and retrieval (NISO, 2001). </p>
<p><strong>Four Key Reasons Why Metadata Matters</strong></p>
<p><strong>1.	Meta data works on image-lead pages</strong><br />
It’s a bit of a cliché but there is some truth in the statement oft-used by search engine optimisation (SEO) experts, that “content is King”. Certainly having a lot of content, that changes and updates regularly is a key criteria in optimising for search engines; however there are many valid situations, web pages and entire websites that are very image-lead. As an example many web designer and artist’ websites would naturally contain a gallery of graphical and image lead work. Ensuring you have detailed meta-data describing the site and page content and the nature of your business ensures that search engines have something to get hold of other than just the image content.</p>
<p><strong>2.	Meta data expands on existing content </strong><br />
There is often more than one way to describe something – perhaps there is an incorrect way of describing something or there is a commonly used slang expression. If you want to keep your pages corporate and don’t want to include this alternate content however you’d like to rank in the search engine results page (SERP) for the slang, adding them to your metadata may help you rank well for text which doesn’t actually appear on your on-page content.</p>
<p><strong>3.	There’s more than one way to spell </strong><br />
There is sometimes more than one way to spell a particular word, for example English spellings tend to prefer the ‘s’ whereas American spellings prefer ‘z’ (e.g. specialisation vs specialization). </p>
<p>If you want to keep your website consistent, you will want to ensure that you keep your descriptions and spelling conventions consistent throughout all your webpages. However what if you run an international website and you want to rank for the alternative spelling? </p>
<p>Metadata can help by allowing you to add these alternate spellings into your metadata. Effectively this data is hidden from your user when they visit the webpage so there are no consistency issues; however it allows search engine spiders to potentially rank your webpage for a variety of other terms.</p>
<p><strong>4.   Good metadata increases click-through rates</strong><br />
Search engines will often use the title and meta descriptions of each webpage when they list the result in the SERP. Pages with good metadata are much more likely to be clicked on than ones with poor metadata for example:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.themediaflow.com/wp-content/uploads/metadata-example-1.JPG" alt="metadata example 1" title="metadata example 1" width="331" height="74" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-566" />Poor metadata – the title of the page is unhelpful, the description doesn’t say anything about the company. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.themediaflow.com/wp-content/uploads/metadata-example-2.JPG" alt="metadata example 2" title="metadata example 2" width="472" height="68" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-568" />Better metadata – the title of the page explains what the company does and includes keyword targets, the meta description gives more detail about the company’s services and what’s on the page.</p>
<p>If any of the contents of your metadata match up with the phrase the user has searched for, the keyword terms will be bolded up in the SERP. Research has shown that users are more likely to click on a result the more bolded keywords there are in the listing, thus it is important to plan your metadata carefully and ensure that every page on your website has unique, hand-crafted metadata. </p>
<p><strong>However</strong> if you leave your metadata out, it’s not the end of the world – search engines will often try and use some of the on-page content in the SERP if you don’t have a meta description and there are “over 200” factors which influence a web page’s position in the SERP for a given keyphrase (that’s the Google secret sauce) therefore you may still rank well even if you leave this key information out. It does tend to be harder and take a lot longer!</p>
<p><strong>References</strong></p>
<p>Google (nd); Google Basics – Serving results<br />
Available from: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=70897&#038;ctx=sibling<br />
[cited: 25 August 2009]</p>
<p>NISO (2001); Understanding Metadata<br />
Available from: http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf<br />
[cited: 25 August 2009]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themediaflow.com/2009/08/why-metadata-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
